Banks collapse in Cuba, according to some social media channels. Hal Turner Radio Show claims Cuban citizens are using social media to brodcast their distress. They claim their accounts have been drained and ATMs have been emptied. While efforts to suppress this information persist, it is slowly emerging.

Remember the Cyprus banking disaster?

Seems it’s the same story, this time, in Cuba. Angry crowds converge on banks nationwide, encountering resistance from law enforcement. In some instances, confrontations escalate as police vehicles are overturned, forcing officers to retreat.

However, these actions seem futile as banks are not only closed but empty of cash. With Cubans having no cash, they’re in a state of desperation.

Many view this crisis as orchestrated by globalist interests, citing the forced adoption of digital banking as a contributing factor to the financial ruin now faced by Cubans.

Concerns are raised about the potential implications beyond Cuba, with speculation about the introduction of universal basic income as a governmental response.

These events prompt reflection on the vulnerability of individuals in a system controlled by globalist agendas. It’s time to withdraw your cash from banks as a precautionary measure, given the precedent set in Cuba.

While banks collapse in Cuba, the possibility of similar actions being taken elsewhere looms. This should ring alarms bells about having a central banking system in the face of government collusion.

Despite the apparent powerlessness of individuals, the potential for collective action is emphasized.

When faced with widespread injustice, large groups can wield considerable influence over financial institutions and governments alike.

Banks Collapse Forcing Digital ID and CBDCs

If banks were to collapse in Australia, it would likely have severe repercussions on the economy and the financial well-being of individuals and businesses.

What’s happening in Cuba may well be a test for a world-wide action. With governments pushing for digital identification systems and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) what does that do to our “freedom”?

1. Convenience and Efficiency
Governments claim Digital identification streamlinea processes to access services such as banking, healthcare, and government benefits.
Similarly, CBDCs help banks simplify transactions, reduce transaction costs, and increase financial inclusion.

2. Privacy Concerns
The biggest concern with digital ID systems and CBDCs is invasion of our privacy. Similarly, CBDC transactions tracked and monitored by authorities, raising concerns about government enslavement of “we the people”.

Centralized databases containing vast amounts of personal information vulnerable to hacking or misuse. Watch “The Net” (1995) with Sandra Bullock.

3. Risk of Exploitation
Authoritarian regimes want digital ID systems and CBDCs to exert control us. With the ability to track and monitor individuals’ financial transactions and behaviour, governments will further suppress dissent and limit freedoms.

4. Dependency on Technology
Reliance on digital systems for identification and currency transactions pose huge risks of technological failures or cyberattacks. Disruptions to digital infrastructure will prevent people from accessing essential services or conducting transactions. This leads to economic instability and social unrest, as we see in Cyprus and Cuba.

Mark of the Beast 6-6-6

In the book of Revelations, chapter 13:16-17 (KJV), and we are warned about the mark of the beast (Digital ID).

“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
“And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Digital ID systems and Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) will bring about the significant benefits for oligarchs wanting to rule the world.

Finally, Digital ID systems and CBDCs raise important ethical, privacy, and security concerns. It seems there’s no consideration to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect individuals’ rights and freedoms.