Challenging Jurisdiction: The power of people and limitations of fictitious entities…

Corporations nor courts inherently possess jurisdiction over individuals due to a fundamental principle. Don’t take this as gospel – do your own research.

Fictitious entities, being mere creations on paper, do not hold sway over people. The created cannot dictate to or rule over, the creator.

Case law precedents establish that courts cannot assert jurisdiction over individuals, as “we the people” are sovereign entities with authority akin to royalty.

Challenging Jurisdiction

The primary reason for contesting jurisdiction lies in the inherent natural rights of people, distinct from civil rights, which cannot be subjugated to equity court jurisdiction.

To initiate legal proceedings, a prosecutor must present a direct victim of the defendant’s alleged crime.

A crime only transpires when one individual (living man or woman) perpetrates an offense against another individual (living man or woman).

When a statute is violated, no crime is committed because statutes are not applicable to people, but rather to “citizens” and other fictitious entities such as licensed companies.

People, in their sovereign capacity, retain the right to submit themselves to any authority or entity of their choosing.

Another rationale for denying government jurisdiction over people stems from the incorporation of most government bodies in the United Kingdom.

According to the Bank of England, government corporations are not granted additional authority beyond their originating charter. Consequently, these entities relinquish their sovereignty upon incorporation.

Jurisdiction must be proven once challenged, as discretion cannot be invoked to ignore a lack of jurisdiction. A court devoid of jurisdiction is obligated to dismiss the case at any stage of the proceedings when jurisdiction is evidently absent.

In instances where jurisdiction is contested, the burden of proving jurisdiction falls on the party invoking it.

A court lacking jurisdiction cannot render a judgment but must dismiss the cause. In such cases, the court’s judgments and orders are deemed void, lacking any authority to reach the merits of the case.

All persons executing these judgments are regarded as trespassers.

The proceedings of a judicial tribunal without subject matter jurisdiction are entirely void in the fullest sense of the term.

A court cannot determine its jurisdiction, as the fundamental issue in any case is its authority to act, which must be initially established by the court.

Beware and be warned – None of this is legal advice. Don’t take this as gospel – do your own research.