Certify correct sentences in quantum using mathematical interface, so reading the sentence both frontwards and backwards has the same volition… And DWM claims this parse syntax grammar construct will correct the world as more people learn this technology…There’ll be a Global Reset…with Communication skills, Banking, International Contracts, and Trade Agreements…

While the Quantum Grammar Coach’s notes on this page are taken from DWM videos, do you own research by reading DWMLC.NET and watching DWM videos.

DWM says that when enough people learn this, it’s set to impact the way the entire planet has to do business. He says: “Man has never gone to war over a math problem in the history of mankind…”

By bringing communication skills into a mathematical procedure, we certify values both frontwards and backwards in every single sentence…

Certify Correct Sentences By Example:

“For the bridge IS over the water” (frontwards) and “for the water IS under the bridge” (backwards)…

“OVER” and “UNDER” are opposite prepositions, and both sentences represent the same picture…

But when you drop the word FOR, which is a [pre-]position, and just say:

The water is under the bridge; the bridge is over the water…

THE becomes an adverb making BRIDGE a verb,
“IS” is an adverb making “OVER” to be a verb,

… And THE is an adverb, making WATER to be a verb

There’s no such thing as a “Water over a Bridge”-verb…

Because of the modification, “IS”, which is represented by an adverb.

All prepositions, and all articles, when used as independent words, become adverbs…

And therefore they create modification, which is change, which then destroys the contents of your contracts.

Instructions To Create Correct Sentences

DWM uses a minimum of 7 [pre]positions

“We use the preposition FOR to start every sentence in this program”.

Because FOR is the strongest of the positions to start a sentence.

DWM looked at all 68 positions and all 38 articles, to reduce the program to the words A, AN, THE, THIS, THESE….

And sometimes DWM uses the word THROUGH (or THRU).

But this is the lion share of 99% of the Prepositions and Articles used in the grammar…

Remember also, the word “AN” appears in front of any word that starts with a vowel.

The rules and regulations of constructing a sentence are same rules and regulations that fiction courts follow… To establish an individual’s ability to stand trial.

So DWM perfects the construct of all sentences in every Quantum Grammar document.

And each sentence qualifies under the rules of what a court has to establish, to be a court.

1. KNOWLEDGE is the very first thing a court must establish… Does the person have the knowledge to understand what is being said to them?

If someone speaks to you in Japanese or Chinese or Russian and you only understood English… You couldn’t communicate with each other…

And you’d need an interpreter to stand in and do the translations…

So what is the knowledge or educational limitations of all individuals in the courtroom…

Consequence of Thinking

2. CONSEQUENCE

After you establish that you have knowledge, next comes the Consequence…

1. FOR THE
2. OF THE
3. IS (Single) or ARE (Plural)
4. WITH THE
5. OF THE
6. WITH THE
7. BY AN AUTHORITY

Having the Knowledge of (an event), there’s the Consequence…

The Consequence is going to be how many facts have you, established through your knowledge…

Once your knowledge is established as FACTS in your brain… It’s like a computer…

In order to bring any information out of your brain, or out of a computer, you have to THINK.

THINKING then becomes the verb of action…

3. VERB-THINKING

There are only TWO verbs of action. ‘IS” as a singular, and “ARE”, as a plural…

Is and Are….These are the only two verbs in the English language…

Running is not a verb; Jumping is not a verb; Driving is not a verb; Trespassing is not a verb; Parking is not a verb.

You have to THINK about doing any of them… Before you can do these conditions of a fact.

So when the sign says “No Parking”

NO = adverb making “PARKING” into a verb..

And so they’ve lied, because you can never create the negative condition of any state. You can’t create a negative condition of a fact.

So by saying “No Parking”, that’s an oxymoron, and it’s “against the law”

Against The Law

Now when you say “Against the law”, that’s a prepositional phrase.

“Against” means No-Contract, and “Against” is a preposition

“The” is an adverb, making “Law” a fact.

So if you’re “against the fact”, and you’re using No-Contract, or No-Trespassing… No = adverb, making TRESPASSING a violation of the use of that, as a condition of state.

It should say:

“For the trespassing on this land IS with the fee of the $5,000”

or

“For the parking of the cars IS with the fee of the $500”

These are performance contracts which are positive. If you have a positive performance contract you then have the ability to say:

”I gave you a positive performance … You agreed to trespass, (in other words) you agreed to perform. And therefore you have a duty through this performance contract.

Now after you establish your thinking capacity to move the fact, backed up by the knowledge… You have to create a possessive.

Position Of A Possessive.

4. “WITH” is your position of a possessive… and we use the word CLAIM because gold miners file claims.

They don’t file mortgages, they don’t ask for permission when they discover gold.

And GOLD which starts with the word AU … they have an authority, so they file gold claims.

Then you make a decision on what the claim is… Is it a POSITIVE or NEGATIVE Claim?

If there are damages, you have a NEGATIVE Claim.

Or EQUITY = POSITIVE claim.

5. CONTRACT-TERMS

Once you establish “WITH”, as a possessive, you now have a Contract-Term, using

OF THE…

So you go ahead and take this possessive, and put it into a Contract-Term, to define the POSITIVE or NEGATIVE of that contract term…

This whole sentence can be as small as seven words or seven facts… Or as large as 200-words in sentences which DWM places in all his documents.

This shows that when you’re going through a mathematical procedure to get to the conclusion …

From the beginning of a fact, there’s a path you have to follow…

6. LAWS, RULES, CODES

WITH THE … is a possessive … of the laws, rules, regulations, codes, duties…

7. BY AN AUTHORITY

Now you have to assign the authorisation of the word “BY”…

BY is the position, to give the authorisation, the author, the authentic, of who creates this document.

Who is the author of this sentence?

And authorisation always runs backwards, meaning the last word in the sentence becomes the authority…

Certify Correct Sentences

To certify correct sentences, you read them front-to-back, and back-to-front…

~1 FOR THE CAUSE: KNOWLEDGE
~2 OF THE CONSEQUENCE: FACTS
~3 IS / ARE ; VERB-THINKING
~4 WITH THE POSSESSIVE:CLAIM
~5 OF THE CONTRACT-TERMS
~6 WITH THE LAWS, CODES, RULES, DUTIES
~7 BY AN AUTHORITY

So if I read this sentence backwards…

BY would become FOR, and

OF becomes WITH, and

WITH becomes OF

Because those are the opposite prepositions…

Just like over, under, in, out, through, around…

So if you read this backwards:

FOR AN AUTHORITY OF THE LAWS, CODES, RULES, DUTIES IS / ARE WITH THE CONTRACT-TERMS OF THE POSSESSIVE:CLAIM WITH THE CONSEQUENCE: FACTS  BY THE CAUSE: KNOWLEDGE [(OR) CLAIMAINT’S-KNOWLEDGE].

In this case we would have a claimant who would be the individual… who would have the knowledge…

… And the same sense as it does front words…

FOR THE CAUSE: KNOWLEDGE [(OR) CLAIMAINT’S-KNOWLEDGE] OF THE CONSEQUENCE: FACTS IS / ARE WITH THE POSSESSIVE:CLAIM OF THE CONTRACT-TERMS WITH THE LAWS, CODES, RULES, DUTIES BY AN AUTHORITY.

So reading the sentence both frontwards and backwards has the same volition…

And that’s how you know the sentence is written correctly in the first place… So now you certify correct sentences in Quantum.