Correct contract writing is a skill that commands big bikkies. And in the adverb-verb-babble world of legal contracts, every word carries weight. Precision in language is not merely a matter of clarity; it can often determine the outcome of a dispute.

Which is the reason why DWM devotes his life to mastering Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar-Performance.

One might not immediately connect English grammar with contract construction, but the two are closely intertwined.

Among the various principles guiding contract interpretation, the “Rule of the Last Antecedent” stands out as a prime example of how grammar influences legal interpretation.

The Rule of the Last Antecedent, a principle rooted in English grammar, dictates that language modifying a contract term should typically apply only to the noun or phrase it immediately follows.

Essentially, it’s about proximity and the relationship between words within a sentence. While this may seem like a technicality, its application can significantly impact the interpretation and enforcement of contractual agreements.

Consider a hypothetical scenario involving a contract clause:

“The company will provide insurance coverage for all employees, interns, and contractors who work in hazardous environments.”

In this instance, the Rule of the Last Antecedent suggests that the phrase “who work in hazardous environments” applies only to “contractors.”

Therefore, only contractors working in hazardous environments would be covered by the insurance, while employees and interns might not be.

However, the application of this rule isn’t always straightforward. Courts have recognized exceptions and acknowledged that context matters.

Correct Contract Writing

Without correct sentence structure in writing contracts, ambiguity can arise. These can lead to lawyers rubbing their hands, as money flows over debates about whether a modifier should apply to a single term or to multiple terms in a contract.

For instance, let’s modify the earlier example:

“The company will provide insurance coverage for all employees, interns, and contractors who work, drive, or operate machinery in hazardous environments.”

Here, the phrase “who work, drive, or operate machinery in hazardous environments” could reasonably apply to all three categories—employees, interns, and contractors.

In real-world legalese disputes, parties may argue over the interpretation of such language, invoking the Rule of the Last Antecedent to support their respective positions.

Courts must carefully analyse the language of the contract, its context, and the intentions of the parties involved to arrive at a fair and reasonable interpretation.

The Rule of the Last Antecedent is just one example of how principles of English grammar inform contract interpretation. Other grammatical rules, like conjunctions, punctuation, and subject matter influence how contract terms are understood and applied.

In essence, the rules of English grammar serve as a foundational framework for contract construction.

Just as grammar governs structure and meaning of language in everyday communication, it also plays a crucial role in contracts.

Understanding grammatical principles is essential to write contracts and effectively interpreting their terms in the event of a dispute.

Any judge, who does not adhere to the correct parse syntax grammar, activates the threat of de novo. And if the court, the vessel in drydock, is not adhering to the treaty to hear grievances, it’s fraud against the state.

When lawyers stick to Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar-Performance, none of these problems arise.

One subject per sentence. Using the present tense only. Mathematically certified backwards and frontwards.

Everyone’s on a level playing field leaving no wriggle-room for lawyers fighting over ambiguities, which often-time destroy people’s lives.

Get started here, and you’ll soon be writing wriggle-proof water-tight contracts, putting adverb-verb lawyers out of business.