Controlling banks and courts often results in a system where financial power overrides justice. These can leave you vulnerable to the interests of the wealthy and influential.

What’s the relationship between banks and the “Justice” system? There’s a perception that courts serve the interests of business and money rather than justice.

It seems large corporations or financial institutions seem to wield significant power in shaping outcomes in legal matters. Let’s unpack this idea.

1. The Power and Influence of Banks and Corporations

Economic Influence: Banks and large corporations hold significant economic power, which can influence various sectors, including politics, policy, and sometimes even the legal system.

They contribute to political campaigns, lobby for favorable regulations, and have resources to hire top legal talent. This economic power gives them leverage, creating an impression of holding disproportionate control over courts and justice.

Litigation as a Business: Courts regularly handle disputes involving large amounts of money, especially in commercial law. During litigation, businesses focus on protecting their financial interests, not on individual rights or social justice.

Corporate Legal Structures: Many corporations have dedicated legal teams and extensive financial resources. This allows them to pursue aggressive legal strategies or outlast individuals in court. This creates an imbalance of power… Individuals with fewer resources are at a disadvantage when going up against a well-funded corporation.

2. Are Courts Business Houses?

Courts as Institutions: Courts are designed to adjudicate legal disputes and ensure justice. They’re also part of a broader legal and economic system. And they can be influenced by the interests of powerful entities.

In capitalist systems profit is a primary motivator. Courts often serve those with the money and resources to sustain prolonged legal battles.

Commercial Courts: These courts focus on legal technicalities and the protection of economic interests rather than broader ethical or social concerns.

Corporate Influence – Corporations and banks have extensive lobbying power. Judges or legal practitioners may have ties to large corporations, either through prior work or financial connections. This can fuel a perception that courts are “business centers” where decisions are made with financial interests in mind.

3. The Role of Money in Legal Systems

Access to Justice: One of the criticisms of many legal systems is that justice is often determined by who can afford it.

Legal proceedings can be prohibitively expensive. For those without the financial means, the courts can feel inaccessible or skewed against them.

Wealthy corporations and individuals can afford long and complex legal battles, and they may even use these resources to wear down smaller parties, making it harder for the “little guy” to win.

Court Fees and Legal Costs: Even outside of corporate disputes, the costs of pursuing a claim in court can be high, from filing fees to hiring lawyers.

Court systems funded through fees create additional incentives to favor those who can pay. This creates a feedback loop where those with money can use the system to preserve their interests. So those without money may struggle to be heard.

Bailouts and Favoritism: The financial system itself is often intertwined with the legal system in ways that benefit large institutions.

Banks can be bailed out by governments during crises. This creates an impression that banks have a privileged relationship with the state and legal bodies.

4. The Balance of Power: Courts vs. Banks

Judicial Independence: Courts are designed to be independent of business interests, including banks. Judges are supposed to make impartial decisions based on law and evidence… Not the economic power of the parties involved.

If courts are biased toward money and power, when individuals face banks in legal disputes they feel steamrolled.

Corporate Influence: Banks don’t “control” the courts in a direct sense. Their economic importance and political influence portray an environment of self-protection by the legal system.

Often banks have sophisticated legal teams that know how to manipulate the system to their advantage. Whether through exploiting legal loopholes, stalling tactics, or simply using the court’s slow-moving processes to wear down opposition.

5. Alignment of Banks and Courts

Legal Reform and Advocacy: Legal aid services and consumer protection groups claim to help individuals who feel injustice with the system.

Public Perception vs. Reality: While businesses do have power and influence, the legal system should protect individuals’ rights.

6. What Can You Do?

Legal Representation: A lawyer with banking experience might be able to help challenge the claim against you. However, they are all part of the same club. And they all use fiction grammar.

Document and Challenge: You can challenge the legitimacy of the bank’s claim. Courts claim to follow due process. And you have the right to challenge unfair or unlawful practices.

Final Thoughts
Often you may feel courts show bias in favor of the rich and powerful. Does this mean the system supports those without wealth or influence?

It’s about finding the right avenues to create a level playing field. So controlling banks and courts, to which they can’t argue, is with the use of fictional grammar constructs in their documents. They all know this.

But do you? Can you prove the grammar fraud?

Because soon, that’s all you’ll have left to defend yourself against the coming tyranny.