Court Rules, Titles and Codes, traps engineered to get you into deeper poo… If you do not know what to look out for, to stay clear and free…
While some of the Quantum Grammar Coach’s notes on this page are taken from DWM videos, do you own research by reading DWMLC.NET and watching DWM videos.
All the Titles, Codes, Rules… Whether it be in your country, USA, China, Russia, doesn’t matter where it’s from…
It’s the piece of paper, that’s the courthouse… And in Quantum lawsuits, you have to define your Titles.
So you want to say “Title 18-241 is conspiracy” and you assign it a definition, it’s just a reference within that document. And that’s what it means, because you define it with a quantum definition.
Or you can say Title 18 USC 3 is conspiracy…
You can say “ABC” equals conspiracy… as long as some place where you take that abbreviation, and assign a definition to it on that vessel (document), when that vessel goes into court…
DWM takes their definitions… eg “USC Title 42”.
That’s the way the government writes it. To correct that, it should have a full colon in front.
:Title (For the Title…)
and there should be a -~42 (a hyphen- tilde).
The tilde separates the word, because tilde is a location. 42 is not a value. The government call it a value, but it’s a location where you find a definition.
:Title-~42 is the correct way to write it.
So DWM corrects the grammar, and copyrights (copy-claim) the correct use of punctuation around the words…
And when you copyright it, a judge will look at that… he knows what his fiction site is…Since DWM has already Syntaxed it, the judge knows what the definition is corrected.
And then it’s assigned to your documents. That way you can communicate both in the fiction in fact world simultaneously.
DWM’s copyright for this technology is worldwide… So no matter what government you go to… all court houses are foreign vessels in drydock…
Say you’re going to the court in Sydney, Australia…You’re not in Australia, you’re not under Australian Revised Statutes, or State of New South Wales statutes…
Courts Rules On Paper
Your rules are what ever it says on that piece of paper…
So if you go in there with a half-baked definition, and a half-baked attitude that you don’t know what you’re doing…
He will declare you to be a derelict vessel who doesn’t know up or down, left to right, in or out…
And he will harvest you for trespassing on his vessel.
So don’t make nonsense.
If you file nonsense, it will be treated as nonsense.
Question: Do you suggest that you notice the court … ten days in advance of the court document… that you plan to go?
No, because when you file the document, that tells the judge by contract, that he’s got 45 days to schedule it for a hearing.
Based on the syntax forensic evidence that’s in the document.
If the judge can’t vacate your ability to communicate at a level of mathematical accuracy, then he has to give you a court date, that’s court rules.
Now, from the time you file the papers… you’re going to get a “Received” document stamp which starts a clock that runs for thirty days.
At the end of thirty days… you must have within that 30-day window, service upon the people that you are talking to… and that information of service back to the judge.
And the judge then will issue a summons to answer the court within 20 working days.
Saturdays and Sundays don’t count in a State matter. And it’s 60 days for Federal, because Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays all count.
45-Day Trust Law
But all comes out to be a 45-day trust law then… Because they’re giving you 45-working days of the 60.
Now the 60 days that they are talking about, that the Federal courts always tell you that you’ve got an answer… Is a trap.
We don’t give them 60.
That’s in their world of fiction.
You take 45-day trust law, which vacates… You’ve got ten-day answer, and a 10-day answer back to the answer… that’s 60 days.
Or you vacate your own case.
Because you don’t know the difference as to what you’re supposed to be doing.
So you will only allow 20 days for an answer… and because it’s a syntax document, you set down the rules and regulations, not them.
Question: Can their answer be that they need more time?
DWM: Don’t give it to them. Because the minute you waiver your time, you’re 45-days speedy trial… they can wait 10 years before they answer you back.
They can’t win in syntax… so anything you’re going to do is tie it up in time.
Don’t give them time.
Question: So if we feel were proficient enough to write in the truth, but not maybe not to speak in it…?
Two plus Too doesn’t equal Fore.
Speaking is irrelevant.
Only what’s written counts.
The court’s going to make a summary decision based on the forensic evidence that you present to them on paper.
Their only reason to bring into the court is trying to entrap you to disqualify your own paperwork…
Court & Summary Judgments
Nine out of ten cases are done under summary judgment based on the forensic evidence of the lawsuit presented to the judge.
It’s only if they want to put up a show for everybody… they’ll go ahead and have a court hearing for it. Or if they know that there’s a condition of perjury on the table… They’ll get the man that confessed to perjury.
DWM can get anybody in the room to confess to perjury and you won’t even know it’s happening… See, if you drop a frog into hot water, he’ll jump out.
If you drop a frog into cold water and bring it to a boil, you will cook him… And he won’t know he’s being cooked, because he’s cold-blooded.
It’s the same thing with the courtroom… If you make everybody feel warm and fuzzy, they’re going to cooperate. But if you shock them, they’re going to get all scared and run away.
You get more flies with honey than you do with vinegar.
Court, Knowledge, and Perjury
Question: Can the judge admit verbal evidence from the bar, ignoring written contracts? Will the individual kill his own case, saying: “I don’t know what’s happening because somebody else wrote this for me”?
DWM wins a case for Baden in New Zealand… When Baden admits to the judge he doesn’t understand all DWM does, the judge has Baden for breakfast…Perjury…
In the Kromer Meier IRS case… DWM defeats IRS because the language is a lie… But ten minutes before Meier’s sentenced, DWM finds out he’s cashed $800,000 Insurance checks, which DWM didn’t know about…
Because the DA keeps it secret until making his final delivery… Saying you didn’t pay taxes on the insurance checks… You laundered money, and lied to the court and the jury, that you didn’t have any checks…
DA says: “I’ve got $800,000 in checks you signed.”
DWM says: Well, that’s perjury.”
He gets three years jail and four counts of perjury, 30 years in prison…
But they only give 10%, so he gets three years of hard time in a federal penitentiary.
Now this is the third time he goes to prison over perjury for IRS claims on checks…You’d think he’d learn the first time.
Question: If DWM represents someone else…Couldn’t the judge do the same in all those cases… Saying the person that DWM’s defending doesn’t know what DWM’s doing?
Well, DWM briefs his clients before going to court … about 10 hours of pre head-banging… To know what DWM’s doing…While they can’t walk the walk, and talk the talk, they understand what’s going on..
But the fact that DWM disqualifies the court, and everything they join into court, means the court can’t move forward.
Doesn’t matter whether you can read or write, the court has no jurisdiction once the court’s disqualified.
Judges Court Rules on TV
TV judges have their own court rules.. Judges (like Judge Judy) say those people signed a contract to vacate their civil rights… Vacate their contract rights, and allow the judge to make a determination over to their oral arguments in court of common sense.
Mostly they show just common sense trials on those TV Shows… On other days, there’s no court in a world that allows such a circus to take place like that…It’s totally up to the discretion of the judge.
There’s a judge in Wisconsin, (later gets disbarred and found guilty of sexual crimes…)
He walks around in court with the old ping-pong paddles… the ones with a little ball and rubber-band on it…
Even in a murder trial, he walks around playing with this thing, because both sides are talking in adverb-verb. He knows the court rules, and the contracts are all adverb-verb, and the jury can’t read and write…
And the judge knows about syntax…that all these people in front of him are illiterate…So he just plays with this rubber ball paddle… and everybody thinks he’s nuts.
Now when he’s challenged by the Chief judges, he says:
“Well these guys can’t read and write… it’s a syntax argument… I’m not going to tell them anything, I’m just going to do what I’m going to do at the end of the trial… And I don’t care what the jury says, because they’re in a box, in some enclosed area…
“They can’t hear evidence or see witnesses.
“So, I’ll make a determination after the fact… and if I don’t want to put my foot in there, I’ll let the jury do whatever they want to do.
“If I don’t like what they do, I’m going to override them and I’m going to make my own decision anyway…”
Judge Changes Court Rules
DWM has a case where the jury comes back and says this man is not guilty. The judge decides to change the court rules, and says:
“Listen ladies and gentlemen you don’t seem to understand. I told you to go back in there and find this person guilty…
“That’s not a request… that’s an order. You’ll find him guilty as charged or you’re going to sit in there for as many months as it takes…”
And they kept the jury in there for a week… 24 hours a day…They wouldn’t let them out of the jury room… until they came back with a guilty verdict.
Because no matter how many times… they had to keep fighting and fighting and fighting and finally they all gave in and they said okay we find you guilty.
…So they could go home their families.
Soon after, the judge gets sued by the greater jury Association for fraud…
When it gets to the higher court, the judge says everybody lied… it’s an adverb-verb case, syntax was on the table, and they all lied… They’re all guilty.
The defendant may be guilty of the crime that they say he is… But he’s guilty of lying on multiple counts of perjury, which adds up to more time for perjury… Than for the charges he’s in court for.
So the judge wants to use a distraction… he doesn’t want syntax being put on trial. The judge doesn’t care what’s on trial… He’s just going to put this guy in jail, because the guy’s lying to the court…And the judge knows it.
But the judge doesn’t want to put out any secrets, so he changes the court rules.
Take the time to learn DWM quantum grammar technology…
And put your feedback in the comments box below… Or email us for help to avoid traps engineered to get you into trouble with Court rules, Titles and Codes …