Fictitious Conveyance of Language lawsuit shows how one point leads to another, revealing the frauds.

These several points are written in “event continuum” format to bring clarity to the various Points in dispute, displaying the fact that one point leads to another and the end issue is connected to the beginning issue.

Deceptive Trade Practices

If an organisation, corporation, or other entity, uses false conveyance of language, we call it “‘deceptive trade Practices”. Such acts and actions are often harmful to the intended victim and bring “ill-gotten gain” to the treasuries of such corporations.

Remember, all governments are corporations. And all legislative court systems are for profit “Also Trades As” corporations. This leaves very few safeguards in place to protect the private man.

The corporate beasts’ prime directive is to instil fear in the minds of the less fortunate persons of involuntary servitude. The most common device in use by such fear-mongers is false conveyance of language.

All organisations within the government are required by 26:C.F.R.: 601.72(a)-1 to publish how the organisations are organised, and the nature of the organisation.

In most cases, there is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that there is a lack of public disclosure concerning the true nature of the organisation. That being demanding monies, fees, fines, penalties, licensing, or prosecuting us.

We have further evidence that the court’s organisation is just as fraudulent. They all are organised as legislative foreign fictions, using subjective interpretation, legal fictions, and the like.

Also, according to court records, the judicial system has been manipulating job titles to confuse and dominate the proceedings.

What are the consequences if we accept and act according to these fraudulent definitions?

We find that we do not know to whom we are speaking, and what authority he is exercising at any moment…

Whether the person we are talking to is acting in his capacity as a clerk, judge, legislator, or whatever.

In the court, are we talking to a judge, legislator, bailiff, banker, or a clerk when we are talking to the guy on the bench in the black robe?

Fictitious Conveyance of Language:

Lack of full disclosure combined with the use of verb language (versus truth language, noun language).

This allows Libellee(s) to be charged with breaching Title 18, section 1001, for their false statements.

And Title 18, section 1002, for their false papers against us.

The organisational structure of the system, the false statements and false papers place us at a legal disability.

So we claim our handicapped status of Title 29 USC- 706(8)(a), and charge them with breaching Title 29 USC- 701(C)(2); the Policy for the rights of the handicapped.

The government has an obligation, Title 42: ch: 126: 12182(2)(A) (iv) to make efforts to eliminate communication barriers hindering the handicapped.

If the opposing party uses all uppercase styling of our names, they are intentionally addressing their pleadings to the fictional “strawman” . They use Title 18 USC-1342 Fiction names against us to Title 18 USC-1341, to cause a Fraud and Swindle.

By not using upper and lowercase lettering, with punctuation, they are in breach of F.R.C.P. Rule 17. Only a real party of interest can be sued in the admiralty.

Why would a person knowingly (title 42-1986) do such a thing?

Deprivation of our Rights

For whatever reason, to hold their beloved system together, they are committing: Title 42-1985(2) Deprivation of our Rights.

Therefore, they are engaging in a Title 18-1961: Racketeering-activity, for their Title 42-1985(2):

Obstruction of the Justice, causing a Title 42: Ch 21: 1983 Personal Injury,

And a Title 42-1983- Note 39: civil Deprivation of the Rights, by their Title 42-1983- Note 319

Title 42-1983- Note: 337 Custom & Policy of their Title 18-241: Conspiracy, under the Color of Law,

Now we have Title 18-241: criminal Deprivation of the Rights,Title 18-872: Collusion/ Coercion,

And Title 18: Ch 73-1512 criminal Obstruction of the Justice,

Wrapping this up with a Title 28-1359: Loss of the Jurisdiction by their Collusion, all under the Title 4 -3 Desecrated flag.