Jurisdictions of law in Australia’s legal system collectively form a confusing framework:

1. Common Law Jurisdiction
Common law, inherited from England, evolves through judicial decisions rather than legislative statutes alone. It applies throughout Australia, filling gaps where statutes are silent and guiding legal interpretations.

2. Statutory Law Jurisdiction
Enacted by legislatures, statutory law covers a wide array of matters and prevails over common law where conflicts arise. Legislatures can modify statutes as needed.

3. Constitutional Law Jurisdiction
The Australian Constitution outlines governmental structure and powers, serving as the supreme law. It defines limits on legislative authority for both federal and state governments.

4. International Law Jurisdiction
Australia incorporates international law, including treaties, either through legislation or common law principles.

5. Equity Jurisdiction
Equity supplements common law by providing remedies in cases where strict legal principles may be inadequate, encompassing trusts and injunctions.

These jurisdictions of law interact harmoniously, each addressing specific legal aspects without inherent superiority over others. High courts, notably the High Court of Australia, establish precedents that influence interpretations across all jurisdictions.

Jurisdictions of Law and Semantics

Yet everything is semantics. Everything is communication, and our ability to control our words. As you’ll discover when you study quantum grammar and jurisdictions of law.

For example, here are some definitions:

Lawful – Refers to actions conforming to recognised laws, ensuring compliance with legal standards.
Legal – Pertains to anything established by law, authorised or recognised within a legal system.
Lore -Involves traditional knowledge, customs, and beliefs passed down within cultures.
Law – Refers to formal rules and regulations enforced by legal authorities to govern conduct.

Furthermore, Australian law defines “person” broadly, encompassing natural individuals and various legal entities such as corporations and government bodies. Jurisdiction of law terms and precise definitions may vary based on legislative context and interpretation.

And, “natural person” denotes an individual with legal rights, while “living man” lacks formal legal recognition and is used in non-standard legal contexts to distinguish individuals from legal entities.

In reality, these definitions say nothing, because why would you want to have use past tense suffixes? Yesterday is no longer. Tomorrow never comes. Everything is Now Time.

We are only here, right now. In now-time jurisdiction of laws. So why would you want to move yourself out of time and space looking at the prefixes and the past tense suffixes?

And the past tense suffixes are like an -ed at the end of the word. When Courts use words like REQUIR-Ed, they move you into the past, and lose Now-Time jurisdictions of law.

You see, “quantum” is a breaking down of the “Quant”, which is the pluralisms that allow everything to come to its least common denominator point. And to come to a conclusion about what the fact is now.

So when people present their cases in Court, they say nothing, because it’s all in adverb-verb babble. When you start studying prefixes to words right all of a sudden you look at yourself and realise that.

For instance, think about when people go down to the bank and do a “de-posit”. But the prefix “de-“ means to separate, from your “posit” or your position.

So the bank turns around and hands you a “re-ceipt”. But the prefix “re-“ means no. And so they give you nothing back.

Which now gives third party access to your account, because you can’t prove you had the funds.