Lawyers’ Misleading Language

Lawyers’ misleading language affects us all. “Fictitious conveyance of language” refers to the deliberate use of false or misleading language to convey a message or legal meaning that doesn’t reflect reality. It’s blatant deceptive or fraudulent communication.

Fictitious conveyance of language, under USC Title 15, Chapter 2b, Section 78FF, carries a $25million fine and 30 years in prison. They fictitiously convey language to extort money from citizens.

The whole procedure how to prosecute judges and attorneys is on the back of DWM’s business card

In Australia there’s no statutory equivalent to “fictitious conveyance of language.” But the idea of deceptive communication, fraudulent misrepresentation, and the manipulation of language is present in legal and contractual settings:

1. Misleading or Deceptive Conduct

(Australian Consumer Law)
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) includes the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This covers misleading or deceptive conduct, addressing the use of false or misleading language. This is relevant in the context of business dealings, mortgage contracts, and bank advertisements.

Section 18 prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce. Using language to deliberately mislead or deceive another party, might be considered a violation of this section.
Section 29: It’s illegal to make false or misleading representations regarding goods or services. This includes representations made in writing (e.g., through contracts, marketing materials, or correspondence). And Internal Dispute Resolutions processes on bank websites.

It’s focused on consumer protection and commercial transactions, while addressing fictitious conveyance of language, using language to deceive or mislead..

2. Fraud – Lawyers’ Misleading Language

Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth): Fraud can apply when deceptive or fictitious language is used to manipulate or defraud another person.

Section 134.1 (Fraud): Intentional deception using false representations, including fraudulent communication via mail or other means. Where a person uses false or misleading language to gain a financial advantage or cause loss to another, it constitutes fraud.
Section 134.2 Fraud committed by deception, e.g. if fictitious language is used in the conveyance of a contract or financial instrument, where false language is intended to deceive the recipient.

In cases of contract fraud or misleading correspondence, if the “language” used in documents (e.g., contracts, invoices, emails) is intentionally deceptive or fabricated, it could fall under this section of the Criminal Code.

3. False or Misleading Representations

Criminal Code and Consumer Protection in Australia target false or misleading representations. This includes cases where someone intentionally conveys fictitious information or uses language to fabricate facts.

Section 29 ACL making it an offense to make false or misleading representations about goods, services, or any aspect of a commercial transaction. If fictitious statements are made in writing, those statements can be prosecuted under this section.
Criminal Code: False representations in documents (such as contracts, financial documents, or government communications) could also fall under criminal misrepresentation statutes, especially if the intent is to defraud someone or cause financial harm.

4. Lawyers’ Misleading Language in Contracts

“Fictitious conveyance of language” applies when one party uses deceptive or ambiguous language to mislead another into signing a contract or agreeing to terms that are not in good faith.

Misleading Contract Terms: Whether it’s due to ambiguity or deliberate misrepresentation, could be considered a form of fictitious language.
Australian Consumer Law:Where a contract is shown to mislead or deceive a party, it could be voided, and the injured party may be entitled to compensation.
Unconscionable Conduct (Section 20, ACL): Where one party manipulates language in a contract to unfairly disadvantage the other party, it could be an example of unconscionable conduct.

This type of conduct can arise where one party takes advantage of the other’s lack of understanding or knowledge of the deceptive terms in a contract.

5. Forgery and False Documents

“Fictitious conveyance of language” – creation of false documents. Forging a signature, altering terms in a contract, or creating fake letters or invoices.

Forgery (Section 145 of the Criminal Code): Creation, possession, or use of forged documents, including deceptive or fictitious language.

The use of such documents in business transactions or legal matters could lead to charges of fraud or forgery.

6. False or Fictitious Financial Statements

Corporations Act 2001: Company or individual uses fictitious language in financial statements or other corporate documents to deceive investors, regulators, or other parties

Section 1308 of the Corporations Act: Covers false or misleading statements in financial records or documents related to a company’s operations.

Remember, laws are drafted by lawyers… Laws are full of lawyers’ misleading language. Syntax any Act, Statute, Code, Rule or Regulation, and you’ll find they contain no nouns (facts).

In Australia, the equivalent to a “fictitious conveyance of language” is covered in separate pieces of legislation. Fraudulent misrepresentation, misleading or deceptive conduct, or false or fictitious representations in various forms of communication:

Australian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010): Misleading or deceptive conduct and false or misleading representations.
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth): Fraud and deceptive conduct by means of mail, documents, or other forms of communication.
Contract Law: Deceptive contract terms or unconscionable conduct.
Forgery and False Documents: Creation or use of false documents containing deceptive or fictitious language.

These laws aim to protect individuals and businesses. They address issues of being misled or defrauded by the use of false, misleading, or fabricated language in communications.

And they include contracts, financial statements, advertising, or other official documents.

The use of fraudulent language, particularly in contracts, can be considered a violation of these laws, both domestic and international.

All communication is effectively a postal matter. And language fraud equals postal fraud.

Your task is learning how to syntax the documents to prove the lawyers’ misleading language fraud.