Legal professional privilege (“Attorney-Client Privilege”) is a fundamental principle in many legal systems. Is it just a sneaky way lawyers try to manipulate the law, protecting the confidentiality of communications between clients and their lawyers? Banksters, service corporations, and multinationals all heavily rely on this to hide their fraudulent operations. Perhaps they think we the people have no way to prove their frauds. Well, they’re wrong.

Bank staff, like employees in any other industry, can potentially use legal professional privilege to protect certain communications or documents from disclosure. This is perhaps one reason why you will not get any response to your communications, at least in writing.

Banksters use legal privilege and legal counsel to shield themselves from disclosing potentially incriminating information. Legal privilege generally protects communications between a client and their attorney from being disclosed in court without the client’s consent.

However, there are limits to this privilege, particularly if the communication involves ongoing or future criminal activities, or if the attorney is involved in facilitating illegal acts.

While legal privilege provides a layer of confidentiality, it doesn’t grant immunity from prosecution if criminal activities are uncovered through other means.

Courts can compel disclosure of certain information under specific circumstances. Such as when there’s evidence of ongoing criminal behaviour. Another situation may be where the attorney-client relationship is being used to further a crime such as conspiracy to defraud.

Ultimately, the legal system pretends to balance rights of individuals seeking legal advice, to uphold law and justice. However, Courts and Lawyers are all part of the BAR. Since the banksters control them all, it’s a challenge to find any lack of bias. Now, by learning quantum grammar, you have the tools to prove the (grammar) frauds.

Using Lawyers To Conceal Crimes?

If someone is suspected of using legal privilege to conceal criminal activities, law enforcement and prosecutors may employ various legal tools to investigate and prosecute such cases.

However, the applicability of legal professional privilege in the banking sector is subject to specific legal principles and regulations. But, as Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the 18th century bankster says, whoever controls the money controls the laws.

So the bankster lower the portcullis and pull up the draw-bridge, handing everything over to third-party interlopers (outside lawyers). They pretend there are limitations to its use, such as using “word salad” when concealing documents and evidence of fraud. So it’s up to us to prove it.

Let’s explore this in detail:

1. Confidential Communications with Legal Counsel
Banksters may engage in confidential communications with the bank’s legal counsel seeking legal advice or guidance on various matters, including regulatory compliance, contractual issues, and litigation. These communications are typically protected by legal professional privilege, preventing their disclosure without the client’s consent.

2. Internal Investigations
Banks often conduct internal investigations in response to allegations of misconduct or regulatory breaches. During these investigations, Banksters may work closely with legal counsel to gather information, analyse potential legal implications, and formulate strategies. Communications related to these investigations, such as reports, emails, and legal advice, may be privileged.

3. Regulatory Compliance
Banks are subject to extensive regulatory requirements and compliance obligations. However, it seems that in reality the banks are the ones that have a heavy influence and control over the regulatory authorities. Classic case of the fox guarding the hen-house.

Using sophistry to hide compliance matters, interpreting regulations, and ensuring adherence to legal standards. Communications related to regulatory compliance efforts may be protected by legal professional privilege. And what the banksters say, must be true and correct.

Legal Professional Privilege Limitations and Exceptions

1. Crime-Fraud Exception
Legal professional privilege is not absolute and may be subject to exceptions, such as the crime-fraud exception. Under this exception, communications between a client and their legal counsel lose privilege if they were made in furtherance of a crime or fraud. When banksters engage in fraudulent activities and seek legal advice to hide those activities, the privilege may be waived, and the communications could be subject to disclosure.

2. Regulatory Oversight
Regulatory agencies have the authority to investigate banks and request documentation and information relevant to their inquiries. Legal professional privilege may protect certain communications. If regulators really had any power, they would challenge the privilege and compel the disclosure of documents. However, why bite the hand that feeds them?

3. Court Orders and Subpoenas
In legal proceedings, courts have power to issue orders or subpoenas to compel the production of documents, including those protected by legal professional privilege. If a court determines that the documents are relevant to the case and not subject to privilege, they may order their disclosure.

In summary, while banksters may utilize legal professional privilege to protect certain communications and documents, especially those involving legal advice or internal investigations, there are limitations to its use.

“Legal counsel” is a fancy name for legal advice, guidance, and representation by qualified attorneys or legal professionals. These lawyers play a crucial role in advising banksters how to cover-up the frauds.

When banksters engage in fraudulent activities or if documents are deemed essential for regulatory or legal investigations, the privilege may be waived. While they all know they are guilty, it’s up to you to prove it.

Now we have the mathematically certified technology to prove the fraud. And that’s why many people are studying correct-sentence-structure-communication-parse-syntax-grammar (CSSCPSG). What are you waiting for? Get started here.