Misleading language usage, also known as fictitious conveyance of language, can cause harm. When an organisation or corporation, engages in the misleading use of language, it’s referred to as “deceptive trade practices.”
It is important to remember that all governments function as corporations. And legislative court systems operate as profit-driven entities. This lack of distinction leaves little protection in place for individual citizens.
“But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
“Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
“For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine”
– 1 Timothy 1:8-10 (KJV)
The primary objective of these corporate entities (“… the lawless and disobedient…”) is to instil fear in the minds of those who are less fortunate. This ultimately subjects them to involuntary servitude. The most commonly employed tactic by these fear-mongers is the deceptive use of language.
What happens when those lawless and disobedient individuals are violating Australian laws by not fully disclosing information and using misleading language?
Specifically, they are accused of making false statements and creating false documents, which is a serious crime.
Under the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) Section 408C, fraud is defined as:
Dishonestly gaining a benefit or causing harm to someone else through deception or fraudulent means.
This includes actions like making false statements, omitting important facts, or engaging in any deceptive conduct.
Misleading Language In Documents
Providing false or misleading documents is also a crime under Section 137.2 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). This carries a maximum penalty of 12 months in prison.
The defendants’ actions, including their false statements and documents, are designed to disadvantage us legally.
We argue that this violates the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) and its policy for the rights of persons with disabilities.
The government is obligated to eliminate communication barriers for people with disabilities. See also :
- Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Sect 1041E, false or misleading statements;
- Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) fraud and deception, including making false representations or statements;
Using false names, with the intent to deceive or defraud others for financial gain, or engaging in schemes to defraud.
Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989 (Cth), mail fraud or using the postal service to facilitate fraudulent activities.
Failing to accurately identify and name the parties involved, violates the Federal Court Rules, as only a real party with an interest can be sued.
Further, they are in violation of the Human Rights Act 2019 (Cth), particularly Section 7, which protects against deprivation of rights.
As a result, the defendants are involved in racketeering activity under the Criminal Code, specifically Section 1B.1. They are obstructing justice, causing personal injury, and depriving us of our rights.
Their actions also involve conspiracy, collusion, and coercion under various sections of the Criminal Code and the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth).
In summary, the defendants’ actions are in violation of multiple laws, including those related to fraud, disability discrimination, human rights, and obstruction of justice.
Chances are they know exactly what they are doing. And perhaps they think most of their victims are clueless, or too fearful to stop these actions.
When you study Quantum Grammar, or Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communication-Parse-Syntax-Grammar, you can prove their frauds.
Got Something To Say: