Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar arms you with knowledge /power to avoid arguing over meanings and definitions especially in any contracts or legal documentation.

“It is apparent,” says Duncan, in his Elements of Logic, “that we are sufficiently provided with the means of communicating our thoughts one to another; and that the mistakes so frequently complained of on this head, are wholly owing to ourselves, in not sufficiently defining the terms we use; or perhaps not connecting them with clear and determinate ideas.”—Logic, p. 69.

“Definitions are intended to make known the meaning of words standing for complex ideas…  And were we always careful to form those ideas exactly in our minds, and copy our definitions from that appearance, much of the confusion and obscurity complained of in languages might be prevented.”-P. 70.

“The writings of the mathematicians are a clear proof, how much the advancement of human knowledge depends upon a right use of definitions.”—P. 72.

“A mistaken idea never fails to occasion a mistake also in the definition. … If a person cannot tell what a thing is, it is commonly considered to be a fair inference, that he does not know. Will any grammarian say, “I know well enough what the thing is, but I cannot tell”

International Rules Of Grammar

Without International rules of grammar, there can be no international commerce, because all commerce begins with a contract. Every thing starts with a contract, whether it’s a verbal agreement, or something in writing.

By following the rules of correct sentence structure, you have power to stop and correct Government departments or agencies, or corporations who are seeking to take money or possessions by force.

While some of the Quantum Grammar Coach’s notes on this page are taken from DWM videos, do you own research including reading DWMLC.NET and watching DWM videos.

DWM claims that without writing sentences using prepositional phrases, all Acts, Statutes, Codes, Rules and Regulations say nothing and have no factual basis. The reason for this is that every sentence contains adverbs, verbs, adjectives and pronouns, yet there are no facts or nouns.

Using past tense and future tense verbs, making verbs out of nouns, and the inherent lack of any substance of verbs… All these factors play a part in the reducing of the written word into a pile of worthless, unenforceable* rubbish… And reduce our laws into impenetrable smoke and mirrors that cannot be relied upon by “we the people”.

*Un-en-Force-able, save for the M.A.F.I.A. style intimidation …

Today’’s lawyers are unwittingly taught to write in ways that give the courts maximum discretion. The uses and the interpretations of verbs play a large role in the manipulation of law. Thus, the law is what the judges declare.  Through the possible manipulations of the verb, unwary litigants are the prey of the wealthy, their lawyers, and of the government with their “law en-FORCE-ment” agencies.

Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar corrects those manipulations… By learning this technology you can write contracts and lawsuits that leave no room for mis-understanding… by writing no wriggle-room, water-tight contracts, that cannot be argued.

For help, an outline of where to start, or any questions and concerns, Send us an email

“If You Learn How To Syntax Your Contracts You Will Learn Self Security. Protect Yourself From Being Harvested”.

– David-Wynn: Miller, 23rd June 2010

English Without The Use Of “Is/Are “

Now, before you think this article is going off track, have a little patience… It’s all coming together and making sense in the last few paragraphs.

With DWM’s Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar technology, “IS” singular, and “ARE” – plural are the only verbs we use for correct grammar, also known as correct-sentence-structure-communication.

Compare this idea with the concept of removing every IS/ARE from your speech…

Here’s an extract from an article by Robert Anton Wilson, “English Prime, E-Prime, Or English Without The Use Of ‘Is’ “.

“E-prime is English without the use of any form of “is” or being.

We’re trapped in linguistic constructs. All that is IS metaphor. I believe somebody said that before me. I’ve decided we can’t get beyond words. What we gotta do is get more cynical about our words.

You’ll find that by dispensing with “is”, and trying to reformulate without “is”, you just naturally fall into the kind of expression which is considered acceptable in modern science.

And also, it’s the type of consciousness that Zen Buddhism tries to induce. Using E-Prime, you will understand modern science and Zen Buddhism both, a lot better than you’ve ever understood them before. Martin Gardner has written a long essay proving that to think like this will destroy your mind. I think it adds tremendously to clarity.

[You can start by]… removing the “is” from my writing more and more. Removing it from your speech is even harder.

Instead of thinking, “The grass is green,” think that “the grass appears green to me.” And this saved me a lot of time. By the way, I don’t get embroiled in arguments like Beethoven is better than Mozart, or rock is better than soul. I define such things as meaningless.

Emotions With Words

So when people get into arguments like that I just say, “Well, Beethoven seems better to me than Mozart most of the time.” … Instead of saying, “Beethoven is better than Mozart.”

“Once you take out “IS” in your negative statements, you find out they are all relative to how you feel at the moment.

If everybody used “maybe” more often, the increase in general sanity would seem absolutely astonishing and completely flabbergast everybody.

Listen to the craziest people on the news and on television, or the craziest columnists in the newspaper. And notice they never say “maybe”, they are always quite sure.

There is no “is.”

They never say, “seems,” they always say “is.”

No one goes to war over a math problem

“I am continually astonished at all of the people in the world who think they know the answer to everything. None of them ever suspect they might be cosmic schmucks and have the wrong answer. And I find that any explanation that makes sense to me is in Korzybski’s Science and Sanity.

These people don’t know how to use language properly. They are using language in an overly-dogmatic way which sets their brain in totally dogmatic modes. So they think dogmatically, they perceive dogmatically, they even smell dogmatically, they hear dogmatically.

And they are locked in a trap of fixed neuro-semantic circuits in their brains. Whereas, knowing I’m a cosmic schmuck, I always think of at least five alternatives.

[Think about what happens] when people start arguing about words.

They mostly arguing about whether the words that they apply to objects they have created out of the infinity of possible objects that could be put together…

They’ve picked up a few of them, put words on them, then they quarrel about the words.

[As DWM, says, “No one goes to war over a math problem”.]

And if these people get to the stage where they are willing to kill one another over the words… [So] they should be put in a nice, quiet home in the country with kindly doctors, and beautiful nurses, and a good sedative.

But generally, they end up in government and start bombing one another.

Or they lead religious crusades for the true faith and kill one another with swords or some such thing.

***

Explain Quantum Physics Simply

“When I moved from Los Angeles, I moved into what I thought was Santa Cruz. Then we had something stolen from our car, and we called the police, and I found out we didn’t live in Santa Cruz, we lived in a town called Capitola.

The Post Office thought we lived in Santa Cruz, but the police thought we lived in Capitola. I started investigating this, and a reporter on the local newspaper told me we lived in neither Santa Cruz or Capitola, we lived in an unincorporated area called Live Oak.

Now, quantum mechanics is just like that, except that in the case of Santa Cruz, Capitola, and Live Oak… We don’t get too confused, because, remember, we invented the lines on the map.

Quantum physics seems confusing because a lot of people believe we didn’t invent the lines…

So it seems hard to understand how a particle can be in three places at the same time without being anywhere at all.

But … remember that we invented all of the boundaries, borders and lines, just like the Berlin Wall… Then quantum mechanics is no more mysterious than the fact that I live in three places at the same time.

No Chinese raised on “I Ching” has ever found quantum mechanics puzzling.

It’s only puzzling to people raised on Aristotelian logic where things are either A or not A.

In the “I Ching”, things are A and not A at the same time.”

Quantum Language – No Jumping To Conclusions

“With quantum mechanics, you can prove that light is made out of particles experimentally.

You can build up a whole mathematical theory of light travelling in little particles called photons… And you can do experiments.

Those experiments will give you a pattern showing that light is travelling like particles.

We’ve also got a whole mathematical theory built up showing that light travels as waves…

As well as experiments that will show you that light travels as waves.

One physicist in the 1920s said,

“It looks as if the damn light is waiting to see how we’re going to do the experiment and then deciding which way it’s going to travel.”
Schroedinger said, “I wish I never got mixed up with this radomptoquantumschringereit. This goddamned quantum jumping.”

The modified Copenhagen view is light is neither waves nor particles until we look, and then it adjusts itself depending on what we’re looking at it with.

An electron is not anywhere until we look, and when we look, the electron decides to be somewhere as long as we’re looking.

As soon as we stop looking, the electron is everywhere again.

Every model we make tells us how our mind works as much as it tells about the universe. These are just human symbolic games. The universe itself is bigger than any of our models.

According to Zen Buddhism, and most forms of Buddhism, and quantum mechanics, any description of the universe which leaves you out is inaccurate…

Because any description of the universe, and the description of the instrument that you use to take your reading of the universe …If the only instrument you use is your own nervous system…

You’ve got to include your own nervous system in your description of the universe.

So, ergo, any model we make does not describe the universe, it describes what our brains are capable of seeing at this time.”

Quantum Language Is What it IS

“Long before quantum mechanics, the German philosopher Husserl said that all perception is gamble.

Every type of bigotry, racism, sexism, prejudice, every dogmatic ideology allows people to kill other people with a clear conscience…

And every stupid cult, every superstition-ridden religion, every kind of ignorance in the world… Are all results from not realizing that our perceptions are gambles?

We believe what we see.

Then we believe our interpretation of it.

But we don’t even know we’re making an interpretation most of the time.

We think this is reality.

Yet in philosophy, that’s called naive realism: “What I perceive is reality.”

And philosophers have refuted naive realism every century for the last 2,500 years… Starting with Buddha and Plato… while most people still act on the basis of naive realism.

Now the argument is,

“Well, maybe my perceptions are inaccurate, but somewhere there is accuracy, scientists have it with their instruments.

That’s how we can find out what’s really real.”

But relativity, quantum mechanics, have demonstrated clearly that what you find out with instruments… Is true relative only to the instrument you’re using…

As well as where that instrument is located in space-time.

So there is no vantage point from which real reality can be seen.

We’re all looking from the point of view of our own reality tunnels.

And when we begin to realize that we’re all looking from the point of view of our own reality tunnels…

We find that it is much easier to understand where other people are coming from.”

= = = = = = = = =

Wake up to Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar

“If you learn how to syntax your contracts you will learn self security.

Protect yourself from being harvested”.

David-Wynn: Miller, 23rd June 2010

And that, friends, is why to-day is the best time to learn Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar.

Because Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar arms you with knowledge/power to avoid arguing over any words or sentences, especially in contracts or any legal documentation.

And no one can argue.

There’s no wriggle-room. For either party on both sides of the contract.

Global consciousness is waking up with DWM’s technology of Quantum-Language-Parse-Syntax-Grammar. And the best source to learn CSSCPSGP is by reading dwmlc.net, buying a copy of his book, and watching DWM videos.