Correct Sentence Structure Communication

With correct sentence structure communication (C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.G.-P.) you can write water-tight sentences no one can destroy, giving both parties fair and equitable contracts, claims DWM. Before you drift off to Yawnsville, or Snoozeville, give yourself a few minutes and get ready for a massive revelation…

Quantum Grammar Coach’s notes on this page are taken from DWM videos and website.. Do you own research by reading DWMLC.NET and watching DWM videos.

DWM says you’ve got to follow the rules of correct sentence structure communication in every sentence, and you can’t violate them. DWM’s entire book, website, every document and every lawsuit, follows these same rules.

By making one mistake within the whole document, means you’ve made a presumption before the fact, and proof you don’t know what you’re doing.

Correct Sentence Structure Grammar & Math Rules

Just as there are rules in mathematics, and order of operations, there are grammar rules (parts of speech) in written and verbal communication.

In the next few minutes, we’ll cover Adverbs, Verbs, Adjectives, Pronouns, Prepositions, Articles, Nouns, Past-time, Future-time, and Conjunctions.

Let’s take the word “PEN.”

For us to communicate, we first have to have an object, or “thing” that we both understand. We assign it an alphabet, in this case the English alphabet… It could be the Russian or any other alphabet, but you and I choose English, 26 letters.

And we’re going to spell this P–E-N.

If you and I sign a private contract and we spell it “C-U-P”, it’s between you and I, and this is now a “CUP” not a “PEN”.

So, firstly, we agree on what the alphabet is, and how to spell the word.

Next, we have to give it a definition.

Thirdly we state the terms, in this case, the term is that the pen is for writing, and so we clarify this fact in our contract.

Because if you take the pen and you make a fist around it… it’s now a stabbing tool, a concealed weapon, and you’ll be arrested for carrying a concealed weapon.

So it’s how you use something, which determines its definition. In this case, according to our communications, it’s going to be a [writing] pen, and so now we have a contract of this object.

Now Who Owns It? Is it :

• for your pen
• for her pen
• for my pen
• for his pen

By changing the ownership (or lodial), you change the definition of where this belongs.

Facts With 900 Definitions

Every “FACT” word has 900 definitions, such as “By the table, from his table, over her table, etc….”

Why say there are 900 definitions? Because there’s 68 prepositions, and 38 articles in English Language, such as At, Am, Because, Before, By, Can, Come, Do, Does, From, He, Her, His, In, Just, Of, Over, It, She, Should, Some, Such, The, They, Their, Then, To, This, Those, Through, Under, etc.

By taking those combinations, 68 x 38 = 2584, then divide by two for repeated words, less about 300 words never used in sensible language, leaves around 900.

And with the rules of correct sentence structure communication in every sentence, you get into multiple orders of operations…

900 x 900 x 900 x 900 x 900 gets to 5.4 gigabytes (GB) or billion definitions, with just six words.

With that many variables, then adding a 7th, 8th, or 9th word… you’re in 2TB of information for just one sentence…

Which explains why there’s so much confusion in “Fiction” Contracts, and how, with DWM’s syntax technology, every sentence has a TB of information in it… accurate to that level…

Because when you put two nouns together, such as Black + Pen, “Black” is a noun, it’s a “Fact,” and “Pen” is also a noun/fact.

Yet the noun “Black” in front of the word “Pen”, changes the description of “Pen”, because now you’re saying it’s black, so you’re modifying the “Pen.”

Therefore the “black” now becomes your opinion… To someone else it’s a “charcoal” coloured pen.

Since your choice of colour description is subjective interpretation, it’s an opinion. Therefore your opinion, presumption, modification has no bearing with the facts of what you’re trying to do, and is not correct sentence structure communication…

Correct Syntax For “The United States of America”

Let’s syntax the phrase “The United States of America” which relates to how Bill Clinton’s “Sex Trial vanishes (another story).

There’s the preposition “OF”, and the article “THE”, but (if you look in any decent dictionary section about “parts of speech”), when they are separate, each of them become adverbs.

The adverb “THE” modifies the adjective “UNITED”, and that adjective modifies the pronoun “STATES”…  And the pronoun is connected by the adverb “OF”, which then modifies a dangling participle verb “AMERICA.”

1. THE = Adverb
2. UNITED = Adjective
3. STATES = Pronoun
4. OF = Adverb (a modifier)
5. AMERICA = Verb (dangling participle verb)

By taking a fact, and modifying it with an adverb, the “fact” becomes a “Gerund Verb” which means a noun used as a verb. And if you’re going to modify something, that’s perjury, because it’s no longer the original fact.

The verb is a condition of your action, and an adverb in front can modify the verb.

With the rules of Correct Sentence Structure Communication, we use “Prepositional phrase, Prepositional phrase, VERB, Prepositional phrase, Prepositional phrase”…

Because the verb stands alone, it doesn’t become a pronoun…

The The Is For The The

Look at DWM’s example of three different syntax definitions for “THE”:

“THE THE IS FOR THE THE”

THE^[1] = pronoun; THE^[2] = adverb; IS = adjective; FOR = pronoun; THE^[3] = adverb; THE^[4] = dangling participle verb (dpv*).

Here “THE” is a pronoun^[1], adverb^[2&3], and a verb^[4].

If you think this sentence makes no sense, read it as “The car is for the driving”

Look in a dictionary and you’ll find three definitions (in every dictionary of the world) that says there’s a syntax definition for:

THE = pronoun; THE = adverb; and THE = dpv*

By adding “FOR” to the front of the sentence:
“FOR THE THE…”, you create a prepositional phrase with a preposition-article-noun.

Authorization runs backwards, starting from the end of the sentence, like signing documents on a contract, giving your authority to everything that runs before your signature… at the bottom.

So it’s not the first word but the last word that has jurisdiction in the sentence.

And the only thing that appears in front of the last word “THE⁴”, is “THE³”, and then you’ve got the next word “FOR”, and you’ve got an adverb-verb

Which means “FOR” has to be a pronoun, and the pronoun is modified by the adjective “IS”

Here the adjective is connected by the adverb “THE²”, which then connects to the pronoun in front of it… because there’s no prepositional phrase to certify the word “THE¹” to start the sentence.

If we say “FOR THE² THE³ …”, then “FOR” = preposition, THE ² = article, and THE³ = noun, making it a prepositional phrase

So “FOR THE² THE³ IS FOR THE² THE³” = Prepositional phrase + Verb + Prepositional phrase

Values In Correct Sentence Structure

You see the danger of dropping one word, by not starting your sentence with a prepositional phrase. Once you drop the prepositional phrase, you create an illusion.

As with mathematics, 3 x 3 x3 x 0 = zero. Anything multiplied by zero equals zero. Same with Facts. A Fact times a Fact times a Fact times a Lie = A LIE

Take the sentence, “The car is for the driving”

Adverb-verb adverb-verb adverb-verb.

What this shows is that the last word, DRIVING, is a verb. All words ending “-ing” words are verbs.

This has the same sentence structure as “THE¹ THE² IS FOR THE³ THE^4″

Where: THE¹ = pronoun; THE² = adverb; IS = adjective; FOR = pronoun; THE³ = adverb; THE⁴ = dpv*.

Which can also be THE¹ = adverb; THE² = verb; IS = adverb; FOR = verb; THE³ = adverb; THE⁴ = dpv*.

Or it could also be THE¹ = adverb; THE² = adjective; IS = pronoun; FOR = adverb; THE³ = adjective; THE⁴ = pronoun.

See, when you’re dealing with an illusion, the subjective interpretation of:

• where you put value, or
• the weight of that word, or
• where you put the emphasis on that word.

All three points are all going to make a determination how it is.

Remember, an adjective always modifies the pronoun. Adverbs modify the adjectives which modify pronouns.

You’ll find this with Corporations of five or six names length, such as Law firms.  That’s where you’re going to have a bunch of adjectives in row, and the last one is a pronoun.

Now-Time Sentence Structure Communication

A pronoun is any word that stands alone. If we say, “PEN”…

PEN is a pronoun, because there’s no contract to make a determination as to what this means.

If Jim asks you for a pen, you’re going to give Jim an object… pull out a ballpoint pen. However, you ask Jim for a “penny”, and because you speak Maori, Jim’s going to reach into his pocket and pull out a penny, which is coinage.

Does “two plus too equal fore”?

Jim’s saying “Pen” but you’re hearing “penny”.

Just like “to”, or “two”, or “Too”

Because you’ve got to be able to communicate with somebody and have a contract to do so, hence:

“So it is written so it shall be done.”

Meaning the oral communications are not what you think they are.

The position, as explained before, is the terms of what your contract is. And once you have your terms of your contract established, we then can have the lodial of ownership which is original.

When you put these two together, you now have a fact.

So once you have a fact, that will become the positional-lodial-fact phrase.

Past-Time words end in -ED, or the adverb “From”, or the prepositional phrase “From”.

Either way, you are removed from “Now-Time”.

There’s no such thing as the past or the future, there’s only “Now-Time”.

You’re always in “Now-Time”, because you’re not reading this yesterday. And you’re not reading this to-morrow, because tomorrow’s not here yet. So whatever the time is that you’re reading it, it’s Now. In “Now-Time”.

Because there is no other time.

Conjunctions With Correct Sentence Structure Construction

There’s two conjunctions, AND and OR. You have to define the meanings of those words, without any presumptions. The word “AND” by itself is not a conjunction, because it doesn’t attach to anything, so it’s a pronoun.

OR is the same thing, it’s a pronoun. Unless you take jurisdiction for it.

If you want an “AND” and an “OR” as a conjunction, or “IS” and “ARE” as a verb, you write these word meanings under your “TERMS” at the beginning of the document.

So no one can dispute your word terms.

7- Step Sentence Structure Construction

1. FOR THE
2. OF THE
3. IS / ARE
4. WITH THE
5. OF THE
6. WITH THE
7. BY THE

Every sentence in a DWM lawsuit follows this sentence structure. And you can “fill in” the blanks.

“FOR THE Claimant’s-knowledge…”

Whenever you start a sentence, write a contract, make any kind of claim, you have to say you have knowledge about what you are doing, that you have knowledge…

“OF THE facts…”

DWM only uses two prepositional phrases in front of the verb, with “IS” and “ARE” being the only two verbs to use when writing correct sentence structure communication.

IS and ARE equals your thinking capacity.

“WITH THE claim”….

In any claim, there’s a Cause, and there’s an Effect.

Thinking is your action, and this is your possessive of the claim, because there’s a “Plus-Claim” and a “Minus-Claim” (positive or negative)

“OF THE terms…”

Terms of Correct Sentence Structure

As everything in past-time is in adverb-verb construct, definitions in all dictionaries are also in adverb-verb…

So DWM uses the word “TERMS”… not “Definition”, because definition = No-fine-Contract.

First you establish the claim, next you establish whether the claim is Positive or Negative, which brings you to the contract…

“WITH THE contract…”

Here you write what it’s going to be, say, for example, it’s going to be the “correct sentence structure communication syntax language contract”…

So the last part of the claim is giving the sentence authority…

“BY THE author.”

Have a look at these words: Author, Authority, authentic, authorization, each word  starting with “AU”, and it’s no coincidence that “AU = Gold” (the metal) in the Periodic Table.

And if you have a signed simulation signature, it’s a simulation, SI-. That’s why they always tell you to put your signature down, write it cursive.

Which means now you’re assigning a simulation to an adverb-verb contract, by participating in the fraud with your own simulation.

Format of Correct Sentence Structure

DWM uses “FOR” at the start of every sentence, because it’s the strongest preposition, and it takes you straight into an argument… or takes you into the facts.

“OF THE” is then used as the effect.

“WITH THE” Claim… after you have any an action of thinking, you have to have a possession.

When you have knowledge… you’re a human being… you have a brain… you see things …you witness and you store information in your brain, just like the computer holds it.

But until you hit the “execution button” to take the information out and move it into sense… you’re claiming one thing in your computer. Your brain functions on the same way.

You store information from your world experiences and then you move it, through thinking; and you make a claim, which is possessive of all this knowledge that you store in your head.

Then you have to define whether or not that claim, the possessive knowledge that you are claiming, is a plus or minus. Are you looking for a reward, or for a damage?

Next you have to define how that contract is going to be argued, and to what these terms are.

And that’s where the whole program comes in… where you’re creating this contract.

Finally somebody has to take responsibility for that sentence… “By THE”.

Front and Backwards Sentence Structure

By writing the sentence backwards (starting at the end of the sentence…) with correct sentence structure communication, it will say the same thing as writing it frontwards.

You do this by swapping the order of the prepositional phrases…

So the “BY” and “WITH” stay together.

“WITH” and “OF” stay together.

 “FOR” and “OF” stay together.

Putting the whole sentence together, it now looks like this:

“FOR the author OF the correct sentence structured communication syntax language contract …”

[Now you bring in the verb “IS”]

“… IS WITH the terms plus or minus OF the claim WITH the facts BY the claimants knowledge.”

Backwards the sentence says the same thing:

• “…with the contract by the author ”  or
• “…with the author by the contract.”
• “For the writing of the checks”…
• “For the driving of the car”, or
• “For the car of the driving”
• “For the text by the author”.

As you see, frontwards and backwards, those conditions are paired.

Cause and Effect always stay together, meaning when you read the sentence backwards you keep these pairs together.

Technically you can move any of these nouns, “Author”, “Contract ”, “Terms”, “Claim”, “Fact”, and “Claimant’s-knowledge”, and put them any place, moving all the terms around, and sentence will still mean the same thing.

Correcting Sentence Structure

In the above example, there are six different ways you can write the sentence forwards, and six different ways you can write it backwards, and it will still say the same thing.

If you can’t obstruct the meaning of something, then it is what it is.

And that’s the unique thing you can prove when you write these lawsuits.

So if you can write the sentence backwards, and it means the same thing as you write it frontwards, you know you’ve done it correctly.

And with this technology of correct sentence structure communication, you can write water-tight sentences no one can destroy.